| Bristol Green House 2008 | Insulation | ||||||||||
blog plans links home email: build@bristol greenhouse.co.uk Foundations Tyre walls Straw bale walls I-beam roof Living roof Clay/Lime render Insulation Earthbags Map |
|
||||||||||
Insulation - the nuclear question. To use straw as loosefill insulation or not? I have done a lot of research into insulation over the last couple of years and have come to think of it as another nuclear question. There are those who think that nuclear power is a good idea because it will help reduce our greenhouse emissions, others believe the ends do not justify the means. Likewise there are those who argue that petrochemical insulation is a good idea for the same reasons. Is it better to be insulated with industrially produced insualtion that took a lot of energy to make? I'd rather use a natural material with a low embodies energy. Manufacturers of these highly efficient industrially produced insulators talk with extremely forked tongues on their websites when they describe their products as eco-friendly. They reason that because they have a beneficial effect on carbon emissions they can call these products eco-friendly no matter how they are made. On the other hand the lovely products made from plants and wool genuinely are eco-products because of BOTH the way they are made AND the insulating effects they have. The truth is that blown foam, or polystyrene or rock wool are literally HALF the price of hemp or wool batts or recycled newspaper insulation. So if you just want good insulation and minimal cost - go rockwool. If like me, you want to make the embodied energy in your building as low as possible you use straw which is a fraction of the price of anything else. When I looked at the material costs of using straw I was feeling very smug. It's cheap, it's local, it's as good as most rival products, it's got almost no embodied energy and it's so non toxic you can chew it (say that about rockwool - however green they claim it is) Insulating with straw does have some downsides. So here, humbly, I admit that next time I may be using the evil chemical products as they may save me, personally, a lot of time and effort. Now, finally, I believe their green hype. Straw loose-fill insulation Using straw as loosefill insulation in both ceiling and floor has cost me a lot. Not in material costs, but in time and hassle. Having used straw in my ceiling the nice building regs man told me I'd have to install plasterboard to bring it into fire regs. This cost me loads of time and money. Stuffing the ceiling with straw had taken weeks anyway. To prevent the straw in the ceiling becoming damp an air gap must be left, this required boxing the straw both above and below. Straw-clay. Takes twice as long. Straw bales, due to their density, are very resistant to fire, however loose straw will burn. This is why loosefill straw insulation needs to be boxed in to fulfill fire regs. An alternative is to coat it all in a clay slip. This makes it very hard to burn. However it takes approximately twice as long to install. After a few hours of doing this I just gave up. |
|||||||||||
![]() |
Left, Dried straw that has been soaked in a clay slip. |
||||||||||
Peter Beresford, the structural engineer, suggested I find out how much the clay slip will add to the weight of the straw, which, of course, is a light material. Here are the results of a simple test. I think I will repeat this test again, just to be scientific, but for the moment it is a reasonable guide to the relative weights of the materials. Weight of straw = 145g |
![]() |
||||||||||
What I'd do different next time. If I build another I will insulate the ceiling using some kind of blown foam which I will put on the outside under the rubber membrane. I'll be able to install this in a matter of minutes rather than weeks. |
|||||||||||
Low cost DIY pipe insulation.
|
|||||||||||